Wednesday March 17, 2010

QUESTION OF THE WEEK



Editorial
Spared the Axe
It’s a relief to find out the hospital upgrade is still on course and we have the grassroots to thank it

There was a nasty rumour going around last week claiming the provincial Liberals had pulled the plug on funding for the Kootenay Lake Hospital renovation.

My first reaction was anger. Not again I thought, flashing back to the Nelson Health Campus debacle that played out under both the NDP and the Liberals. But strangely I wasn't shocked.

The Liberals are drunk with power and bent on handing over the province to the opposition NDP in three years. Besides, we're in the hinterland with an MLA on the opposite side of the Legislature. We matter very little to the inner circle in Victoria. It would seem if you wanted people screaming angry insults, you might as well do it in a place where the shouting has to clear several mountain passes to even be heard on Government Street.

Despite being immune to political disappointment, it was a tremendous relief to read the top story in Wednesday's Daily News. Interior Health confirmed that the $15 million project has been spared the Liberal axe and it's still full steam ahead.

It was also encouraging to hear local IHA administrator Diane Gagnon comment that much of what makes this project bulletproof to the carnage going on in other areas is the way it came together. The renovation is a product of regional cooperation and strong local support. It seems Victoria recognizes it and respects it.

Our municipal government leaders and groups like the Kootenay Lake Hospital Foundation have shown even the most jaded provincial bureaucrat how much we really want this project. Instead of infighting and holding our hands out, this project has been driven from the grassroots. It's a recipe for success.

The fact the upgrade is proceeding isn't cause for a special "We Love the Liberals Day" to be declared. Far from it. But we should be thankful Victoria recognizes the hard work being done at the local level. We also have to ensure we continue to do everything we can to continue to support this project.

— Managing Editor Bob Hall


Comments

Oasis says...

I agree, BC Liberals" are not liberal at all, more aligned with the Reform party, or really Socreds.

As for Nelson, it is a divided city. On the face of it there seems to be liberal, progressive and creative people all over the place, but the other part you don't see so much is very conservative and seems to have a lot of influence over decisions made about what goes on in Nelson.

Just look at the delay in getting an outdoor skatepark for one example, and Kutenai Landing for another.

Posted on January 25, 2010 @ 7:38 pm PST | Report post to Editor | 3145952 

DRGood says...

This is off topic only to reply to Choco... I think I follow you: you are vaguely conspiratorial.

But are you sure you have you facts right about hydro projects? Slocan City has one in the works. Others did explore the idea but the up shot is that BC Hydro pays 3cent/kilowatt purchasing from Independent Power Projects. So any small scale project will take a very long time to realise a profit (<10MW / year); communities must be prepared to live with a net cost (to finance) for about 25 years before money is made - maybe worthwhile on projects with 75 yr lifespans. Only projects of sufficient scale (eg Glacier-Howser) would realise a profit sooner.

BC hydro has been against Independent Power Production forever. Centralized power suits their plan better. If IPP's (Communities included) could get 7cents/kilowatt (like green power production in Ontario) the game would be different.

Posted on January 20, 2010 @ 10:34 pm PST | Report post to Editor | 3122518 

Choco says...

This is a little off topic, but somewhat related so bear with me. I have loosely followed the policies since the "liberal" govt came into power in British Columbia with Gordon Campbell in 2001. I read about allocating stumpage fees for promoting private enterprise corporate products, the outsourcing of expense, socialism the internalization of profits, capitalism or, better, capitalism merging with state equals facism. I also understand the "liberals" privatized BC Rail. And most troublesome, wasn't it the "liberal" govt that privatized future comunity hydro projects, making it illegal for communities to own and control their own resources? This is not liberalism, this is Chicago School neo-liberalism, or the same thing as the neo-conservatism. Language and terminology is important.


My question to anyone, do people think these types of "liberals' are synonomous with progressives?


I certainly don't and think so and believe that the clarification needs to be made by the Nelson Daily News editors.

In my observations from the many times I've visited Nelson, Nelson is progressive, not neo-liberal/neo-conservative. Am I wrong?

Posted on November 10, 2009 @ 9:52 am PST | Report post to Editor | 2933838 

Post a comment

You must be Registered and logged in to post a comment.

Register or

Nelson Daily News welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.




Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Interactive Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2009 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?